Is ‘first-mover advantage’ real — or just startup mythology?

We often hear that being the first to enter a market gives companies an unbeatable edge.

But if we look deeper — many first movers struggled or died, while fast followers (think Facebook after MySpace, Google after Yahoo) dominated.

In your experience:

  • Is being first truly an advantage?
  • Or is it better to move second, learn fast, and out-execute?
  • What are real-world examples you’ve seen?

Would love to hear both wins and war stories from those who’ve been through it!

As companies look to enter new markets, the question of whether being first to enter provides an unbeatable advantage is a common one. While there may be anecdotal evidence of first-mover success, it is important to look at the data and consider other factors. Below are some key points to consider:

• Being first does have some advantages:
○ Brand recognition: Being the first to offer a new product or service can help establish a strong brand identity and create customer loyalty.
○ Market share: First movers have the opportunity to capture a large portion of the market before competitors enter.
○ Patent protection: Being first to market can also allow a company to secure patents and protect their innovations from competitors.

• However, there are also disadvantages to being first:
○ High costs: Being the first to enter a market often comes with high costs and risks, including extensive research and development, marketing, and establishing distribution channels.
○ Uncertainty: First movers are often entering uncharted territory, making it difficult to predict market demand and potential roadblocks.
○ Copycat competitors: First movers also run the risk of competitors quickly copying their ideas and entering the market with their own offerings.

• Fast followers can leverage first-mover disadvantages:
○ Learning from mistakes: By observing and studying the first mover’s actions, fast followers can learn from any mistakes and improve upon their strategies.
○ Improving upon and adapting: Fast followers have the advantage of being able to improve upon and adapt the first mover’s product or service based on customer feedback and market trends.
○ Cost savings: By entering the market later, fast followers can save on the costs and risks associated with being the first mover.

• Real-world examples:
○ Facebook: Facebook was not the first social media platform, but they were able to learn from and improve upon the earlier platform MySpace.
○ Google: Google was not the first search engine, but they were